About the book: year / "Perhaps everyone will understand this book, but each in their own way. However, it is still a textbook, at least I very much I hope that it can become such. However, despite all the warnings of its author, I consider Ludwig Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus to be a textbook. Apparently, I understand “textbook” in some other “sense.” “, in which no “truth” was ever born, and could not be born, I started off, starting my work on this text, the form of which, to a large extent, is a tribute to my admiration for the “divine Ludwig”. The book addresses my own a problem that, however, I consider universal... We vegetate in the world of signs, where any attempts to talk about reality are both futile and absurd. We do not notice that signs have long replaced all reality in our country, and we operate with them as if. if they are - some kind of genuine reality, which is, in fact, pure “metaphysics”...... In essence, my treatise is about what a person should understand, what he can know about and what he should think. However, although, as it seems to me, the answers to these questions have largely been found definitively, the problem cannot be considered solved. And all this only once again demonstrates how little use there is in answers, even if they are the most wonderful, if they are only answers…"