About the book: year / Unshakable concepts of honor, goodness, justice - who is more understandable and inherent in them? A person who considers himself the crown of nature, the only thinking and feeling being and considers himself to be among the clergy of the undisputed bearer of goodness and enlightenment, or those who are denigrated and accused in advance by him, ranked among the lowest, most evil creatures. Where are there more bright ideals: in the kingdom of technological progress and reason or in a society living according to the laws of nature? Is a person able to understand and accept someone other than himself??