About the book: 2023 / Give more of your own than take someone else's? Or take more of someone else's than give of your own? Or maybe equal and: no more, no less? After all, we are all exhausted without replenishment... Take, for example, you and me. Threads with knitting needles as tasks. And related things, like a goal. Sooner or later: the threads run out, the knitting needles bend, things are sold. And yes, maybe we were great – we dressed everyone! Ours and not ours. Acquaintances and strangers. But... Have we forgotten anyone? Yourself, for example? And not even in importance. In order. Yes! What about the questions? Is our altruism true to their greed? No. Is our egoism then true regarding their altruism? Also: “no”! And if we do not take into account those who dropped out and the remaining answer, like the winner, is it correct in itself? If you give, as well as take, your own and someone else's? "Faithful"! Especially if you consider that in the correct understanding of the question, where no one is left at a loss, only the answer fifty to fifty gives a hundred. One hundred out of a hundred. And as it is! And I agree with this. And you?